|
|
"hasn't everything been said
already..?!"
Zarathustra, da Vinci, Michaelangelo, Jordans, Kant, Wild, Heuss, Menuhin, Postman, Eibl-Eibesfeldt BCZarathustra (1000 BC) ACLeonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) Immanuel Kant, (1727-1804) Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900) Prof. Dr. Theodor Heuss (1884-1963) ------------------------------------ With warm wishes to the United World Philharmonic Youth Orchestra from Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt (1928 - ) excerts from his book Costs of Freedom - Limits of Security (Publisher Rüegger - Zürich/Chur) the trap of short-term thinking - our programming on the competition at present
short resumé We are a part of the most successful species. But our success is demanding new challenges of adaptation because we, within our work-sharing millions-strong society and our technical civilisation, created an environment where our historical roots are not sufficientely adapted.
For the longest period of time in our history we lived on a level of stoneage dear hunters. Our emotions and way of thinking are stone aged based and created for a life as a family connected personal contact and related small-group adopted, which are territorially separated.
On a cutural basis we are able to extend the family small-groups-ethic into friendly larger groups, which are linked between many alliances. There are behavior-dispositions which contribute and others which produce conflicts in special situations.
A very old stoneaged programming is our competition based behaviour of dominant effort with its concentration on the competition at present.
This prevents sustainable behavior in daily action!
At present within the global framework of globalization mentioned competition, which has been rightly critisized as predator-capitalism, is trying to legalise itself with the power of nature which knows no mercy.
That is true in many cases, but is obviously not the rule. Even vertebrates, which show no prosocial behavior, developed a non-blood competition of forces within ranking-fights, because it developed as an advanged.
Mammals in addition developed, related to evolution, the individual caring behavior and motivation as well as the capability of individual relations, which opened new opportunities for kindness, love and empathy which made permanent co-habitation possible. Because of our ability of speech we are aditionally able to overcome our emotionally based behavior of the dominant, at present, as we have the imagination and awareness of the past and the present.
That is why we are also able to develop a generation related survival-ethic, which finally will achieve the goal of happiness of future generations.
Based on the eco-social market economy we are on a good track to live in peace with nature and mankind, although, we are open to corrections of our mistakes on our way to this goal.
The counter-productive, within the framework of globalization, mistakable development of farming, industrialisation and commerce as well as the problems as a result of requests of unlitimted open borders for immigrants has been reflected, and a concept of the eco-social area of peace has been confirmed. Translation german to english by Christopher Pearce __________________________________________________________________________________ In Memoriam Best wishes to the project from Neil Postman, October 20, 1999 Of course, it is to late in the year for me to involve myself in the Convention (Cop5, UNFCCC), but it all seems both exciting and worthwhile. Perhaps I could connect with you in the future. Forward We are amusing ourselves to death by Neil Postman We were keeping our eye on 1984. When the year came and the prophecy didn't, thoughtful Americans sang softly in praise of themselves. The roots of liberal democracy had held. Wherever else the terror had happened, we, at least, had not been visited by Orwellian nightmares. But we had forgotten that alongside Orwell's dark vision, there was another - slightly older, slightly less well known, equally chilling: Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Contrary to common belief even among the educated, Huxley and Orwell did not prophesy the same thing. Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley's vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think. What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions". In 1984, Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us. This book is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right. --------------------------------------------In
Memoriam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Menuhin: I am happy to be able to greet my young
colleagues of the United World Philharmonic on this great
occasion, their own inaugural concert, but happening also in
Kyoto to inaugurate the climate change conference.
Interviewer: Can you say something about the problem of soil erosion? We have to think about the developing world, especially Africa. Lord Menuhin: Owing to our own western great advance in
technology and owing to the preponderance we have in terms of
equipment, money, weapons, we are not aware of the penalties that
the rest of the world is paying for our temporary well-being. Interviewer: Do you think that we can find solutions together with the United Nations? Lord Menuhin: Yes. I think solutions, or at least a
retardation of the speed with which the menaces are crowding in
around us, must start with a re-education of children. This is
not difficult. Interviewer: Do you think it is true to say that it will still take mankind 500 years to be further developed than monkeys? Lord Menuhin: We don't have 500 years. Without
education, and if we let things drift as they are now, I don't
think we have 500 years. I think that we must act immediately.
The dangers are too close and they have already taken their toll
in many parts of the world. There are parts of the world that are
on the verge of famine, or have famine. There are parts that are
diseased, there are parts where there are no trees growing. There
are many peoples, and many races, and many species who have
become extinct.
Interviewer: What part can classical music play in educating mankind? Lord Menuhin: Well, I am actually more interested in children singing themselves, singing and dancing. Yes: folklore, classical chorales, religious music, folk music of every kind from every part of the world - that is very effective. I think just listening passively is not sufficient. Interviewer: To be active. Lord Menuhin: Yes. Interviewer: Do you think the change for a better world should come from the individual in principle- as a grass-root movement? Lord Menuhin: I think it will come from individuals. I
don't think it will come from governments. I think it will come
from groups of people who are convinced and non-governmental
organizations and from private people and modest people like a
wonderful little group in Switzerland that calls itself "Un
pays - deux peuples" - "One country - two people"
and always one Israeli woman and one Palestinian woman go
together. Interviewer: You were always a leading personality for society, a guide. Lord Menuhin: No, not a guide but simply one who felt
very deeply for the ills of mankind, and for the sadness of
people who lacked compassion and for the desire just to see
people understand each other. Our century has produced such
disasters. And the fact that people who behaved in an
unacceptable way are people who today are the most civilised and
that terrorists have become Nobel prize-winners simply proves
that we are redeemable - that if we are ready to confess, if we
are ready to mature, then we are redeemable, we can do good
things.
Interviewer: Compared with your own youth, do you think Chloe has a harder life now? a harder development for her career? Lord Menuhin: I don't think so. I think gifted
violinists, gifted instrumentalists, with much to communicate
will have the opportunity of doing so, I am sure. I really do
feel that. Interviewer: Are the marketing departments of record companies and so on a danger because they just promote musicians? Lord Menuhin: The danger of the "classical world"
is that we have exploited Beethoven without putting anything
back. We are playing him all the time, he's becoming banale, and
instead of being deeply moved by his music and playing it as it
should be, we hear it in any which way. Interviewer: From a marketing standpoint it's easier to have a fast career in this media world but for the development of the soul of an artist it has become more difficult. Do you agree? Lord Menuhin: I know. The only criteria at competitions
are those that hold for the Olympics, that is speed and you can
measure loudness. Interviewer: They are frustrated? Lord Menuhin: Frustrated? Yes, yes. Interviewer: Human society must reflect more about itself to see what should be achieved, and to re-evalutate its goals. Do you think that our concept to use classical music as a messenger in this sense is correct? Lord Menuhin: I think so. I think music is a wonderful
messenger, that's true. But I think we have a little too much
faith perhaps in just an isolated concept. Interviewer: To rediscover the right spirit? Lord Menuhin: Yes. Interviewer: And for a better society? Lord Menuhin: I hope. Interviewer: I thank you very much.
Interview by Rüdiger Schramm/ Brussels, November 1997
|
|